Our analysis builds on the debate by comparing the impact of insider and outsider attitudes on union positions. Dualization theory argues that unions reflect dominant members - usually insiders - while the solidarity approach sees unions backing all vulnerable groups, regardless of dominant member opinion. We argue that the picture is more complex. Unions do care about insider as well as outsider member attitudes and they take both the level of union membership and level of union participation (e.g. discussions, meetings) into account. Each class in the workforce displays different patterns of membership and participation. We argue that these patterns determine influence on union position rather than pure ideology. We define six different class groups of insiders and outsiders according to their skill levels (low, medium, high), employment sector and occupation. If a particular class group is going to shape unions positions, two conditions must be met: (1) high union membership and (2) high union participation. The absence of either condition reduces the influence of the class group. In our study, only two groups satisfied both conditions: blue-collar workers (low-skilled insiders) and low-service functionaries (low-skilled outsiders). We therefore formed the hypothesis that their views have most influence on union positions. We used survey data from the German Internet Panel to determine class groups and their positions on unemployment benefits and labour market regulation. Macro-level data from the Reform Monitor on Political Conflict was used to determine the stance of six different unions. We observed the strongest correlations with union positions for low-skilled insiders and low-skilled outsiders and we suggest that if these groups change their views, union positions are likely to shift accordingly - reflecting both the logic of membership and participation. In addition, a general trend towards dissatisfaction with welfare state reforms by trade unions was evident after the general election in 2016. Since the reform of unemployment benefits was highly salient, we note that salient campaign topics may strongly affect post-election union positions.
Prof. Claudius Wagemann vom Fachbereich 03 übernimmt zum Sommersemester 2025 den Vorsitz der Akkreditierungskommission der Goethe-Universität. Was ihn antreibt und welche Ziele er verfolgt, verrät er in einem ausführlichen Interview.
"Ich freue mich darauf, sehr praktisch dazu beizutragen, dass Studierende an der Goethe-Universität ein gutes Studium absolvieren können", erklärt Wagemann und gibt dabei auch persönliche Einblicke in seine eigene Studienzeit und seinen Werdegang.
Die Akkreditierungskommission sichert die Qualität aller Studiengänge der Universität und begleitet deren Weiterentwicklung. Prof. Viera Pirker, Vizepräsidentin für Studium und Lehre, betont die Bedeutung dieser Arbeit und begrüßt Wagemanns Bereitschaft, den Vorsitz zu übernehmen.
Interfaces for Democratic Participation: Deliberation, Mobilization and Contestation Since the Onset of the Covid-19 Pandemic
We are pleased to announce that our team successfully applied for the Horizon Europe project INTERFACED (2025-2027). Amidst growing protests, declining trust in democracy and science, and increasing societal inequalities exacerbated by the Covid-19 pandemic, it investigates diverse forms of non-electoral political participation. At its core are the so-called interfaces – such as referendums, street protests, social media debates, petitions or citizen assemblies – through which citizens may engage in decision-making and governance within representative institutions.
The principal objective of INTERFACED is to analyse these participation interfaces, their democratic underpinnings, their role in mobilizing the least engaged and most disadvantaged groups, and factors driving participation. Based on the empirical findings, the project aims to propose policy recommendations to improve the relations between citizens and their governments and to enhance the accountability of governance structures.
The project's consortium comprises ten European countries and Tunesia, and it is led by the City University of London. Applying an interdisciplinary approach, INTERFACED employs a comprehensive methodology – including large-scale surveys, experiments, computational tools, ethnography, textual analysis, and comparative qualitative methods – to examine the country cases of the United Kingdom, Denmark and Germany (North-Western Group), Austria, Hungary and Romania (East-Central Group) as well as Spain, Italy and Tunesia (Southern Group) for the (post-)pandemic period of 2020-2025.
The Work Package of Frankfurt investigates the feed through from participation interfaces into the institutions of representative democracy. Prof. Dr. Claudius Wagemann engages as Principal Investigator and Anna Geyer as Research Associate.
Wir freuen uns bekanntzugeben, dass Mohamed Salhi seine Dissertation "The Crisis Zeitgeist: Analysis of Far Right Populist Parties' Narratives in Times of Imaginary Crisis" am 2. September 2024 erfolgreich verteidigt hat.
Als Doktorand und DAAD-Stipendiat an unserem Lehrstuhl führte Salhi innovative Forschung zur diskursiven und linguistischen Zusammensetzung des Krisendiskurses rechtspopulistischer Parteien durch. Aus einer kritisch-linguistischen Perspektive untersuchte dieses Forschungsprojekt den Prozess der diskursiven Krisenproduktion und verband (konstruierte) Realitäten mit sprachlichen Mustern. Dabei wurde aufgezeigt, dass rechtspopulistische Parteien Krisen produzieren und narrativ gestalten, um diese als ihre eigene Daseinsberechtigung zu nutzen. Mithilfe einer weiterentwickelten Form des diskurshistorischen Ansatzes ergab sich eine bemerkenswerte Bandbreite an Erkenntnissen über die strategischen und manipulativen Funktionen sprachlicher Muster.
Seine Dissertation leistet einen wichtigen Beitrag zur Neukonzeptualisierung der Beziehung zwischen Krise und Populismus als wechselseitige Konstitution. Dies wird durch eine sorgfältige Analyse sprachlicher Mittel belegt, die sich unter anderem auf lexikalisch-semantische Felder, Satzstrukturen, Modalität, rhetorische Mittel und Stilistik erstreckt, sowie auf diskursive Praktiken in der Darstellung sozialer Akteure, Phänomene, Ideologien und Realitäten.